هرگز نه: جج نروانا جي خلاف عجيب 'چائلڊ فحش' جي مقدمي کي رد ڪري ٿو

هرگز نه: جج نروانا جي خلاف عجيب 'چائلڊ فحش' جي مقدمي کي رد ڪري ٿو
هرگز نه: جج نروانا جي خلاف عجيب 'چائلڊ فحش' جي مقدمي کي رد ڪري ٿو
پاران لکيل هيري جانسن

Nirvana’s legal representatives stated that, if proven true, it would mean anyone owning the record is “guilty of felony possession of child pornography.”

Last year, Spencer Elden, now 30, who was the naked baby on نروانا’s 1991 ‘دل ۾ نه ڪجو’ album cover, filed a ‘child pornography’ lawsuit accusing the band of sexual exploitation and arguing that the cover art constituted child sexual abuse.

The band had dismissed the claim as “not serious” from day one.

مڪلي، ڪيليفورنيا Central District Court judge, Fernando M. Olguin, has rejected a lawsuit, after Elden’s legal team failed to meet a court deadline.

In his legal filing, hMr. Elden argued he’d suffered loss of wages and “enjoyment of life” due to the use of the photograph, saying it had caused him “extreme and permanent emotional distress.”

The band responded to the allegations last month by filing a request in court to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that Elden’s allegations lacked merit.

“Elden’s claim that the photograph on the ‘دل ۾ نه ڪجو’ album cover is ‘child pornography’ is, on its face, not serious,” Nirvana’s lawyers said, alleging that he had previously appeared to enjoy being known as the “نروانا baby.”

Urging the court to dismiss the claim, Nirvana’s legal representatives stated that, if proven true, it would mean anyone owning the record is “guilty of felony possession of child pornography.”

Also, the band further stated that Elden’s case failed to stand up in court because the statute of limitations on his claim expired in 2011, preventing him from being eligible to sue.

Elden’s lawyers at Marsh Law refuted the band’s defense by stating “child pornography is a forever crime,” adding that any money earned from the image “creates longstanding liability” and “breeds lifelong trauma.”

As Elden’s team failed to meet the December 30 deadline to respond to نروانا’s request for dismissal, Judge Olguin rejected the lawsuit.

Elden’s team has until January 13 to refile the case.

هن آرٽيڪل مان ڇا وٺو:

  • Also, the band further stated that Elden's case failed to stand up in court because the statute of limitations on his claim expired in 2011, preventing him from being eligible to sue.
  • The band responded to the allegations last month by filing a request in court to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that Elden's allegations lacked merit.
  • “Elden's claim that the photograph on the ‘Nevermind' album cover is ‘child pornography' is, on its face, not serious,” Nirvana's lawyers said, alleging that he had previously appeared to enjoy being known as the “Nirvana baby.

<

ليکڪ بابت

هيري جانسن

هيري جانسن لاءِ اسائنمينٽ ايڊيٽر رهيو آهي eTurboNews 20 سالن کان وڌيڪ عرصي تائين. هو هونولولو، هوائي ۾ رهي ٿو ۽ اصل ۾ يورپ مان آهي. کيس خبرون لکڻ ۽ ڇپائڻ جو شوق آهي.

۾ شريڪ ٿيو
جي خبر ڏيو
مهمان
0 تبصرا
Inline Feedback
سڀ تبصرا ڏسو
0
ڇا توهان جي سوچن سان پيار ڪندو، مهرباني ڪري تبصرو ڪريو.x
حصيداري ڪريو ...